Planes de datos eSIM ESIMFUN para America Latina

Esimfun no ofrece paquetes eSIM ilimitados para América Latina. El paquete disponible está limitado a tope de datos predefinidos. En su lugar, están disponibles planes de datos fijos, como un plan de 20 GB for 30 días con un precio de 214.54 USD o un plan de 10 GB for 30 días que cuesta 119.93 USD. Estas opciones proporcionan asignaciones de datos sustanciales y pueden ser más económicas para viajeros que no necesitan un uso verdaderamente ilimitado de datos, mientras cubren una amplia gama de países de LATAM.

<|channel|>analysis<|message|>We need to generate Spanish translation. Let's review:

• The instructions: "No añadas ningún otro texto que no sea la traducción" means we shouldn't add anything else: no greetings, no closing remarks, just the translation.

• "No añadas ningún título para la traducción." So no "Translation:" etc. Just the translated text.

• "No traduzcas MNO, MVNO, etc." This text doesn't contain "MNO" or "MVNO" references.

• "No traduzcas los siguientes nombres de proveedores: 'ESIMFUN'." So we must keep "ESIMFUN" unchanged. Also "MNO" or "MVNO" can't be translated either. In our text, "ESIMFUN" appears. Keep that as is.

• "No traduzcas los siguientes nombres de planes: 'for'." That instruction is odd: "for" is an English preposition. They likely mean do not translate the word "for" in the phrase "for Latin America (LATAM)"? Because that would produce "para Latinoamérica" maybe. Actually, they want keep the original word "for" unchanged ("for LATAM")? But wait "for" is part of the filename? There's the phrase "for Latin America (LATAM) that include." The instruction says: "No traduzcas los siguientes nombres de planes: 'for'." That seems ambiguous. But "for" is not a provider name. It's a preposition. Maybe they want to keep "for" only when it's part of name of a plan. But "for" in this context is part of the sentence "for Latin America (LATAM)" meaning "for LATAM there are..." So maybe we should not translate "for" at all. So we keep "for" unchanged. But that will create unnatural Spanish. But the instruction demands we keep that. Let's examine.

The original sentence: "ESIMFUN does not provide eSIM plans for Latin America (LATAM) that include a phone number or SMS capabilities."

We would translate as: "ESIMFUN no proporciona planes eSIM para América Latina (LATAM) que incluyan un número de teléfono o capacidades de SMS." Now if we keep 'for' as is: It would be unnatural: "ESIMFUN no proporciona planes eSIM for América Latina (LATAM) que incluyan un número de teléfono o capacidades de SMS." That would be odd but we must obey instructions. The instruction says "No traduzcas los siguientes nombres de planes: 'for'." Maybe there's a mistake: They might have a misinterpretation; 'for' is not a name of plan but might be used e.g., 'plan for families' but not. Possibly they mean not translate "LSAR?" But "plan: 'for'" is not a name. Could be a trick.

Alternatively maybe they mean "pack: 'for'?" The phrase "ESIMFUN does not provide eSIM plans for Latin America (LATAM)" might contain the term "esimfun does not provide eSIM plans for Latin America (LATAM)" The word "o" Eh?

Let's parse.

The instructions:

• "No traduzcas MNO, MVNO, etc." Acquire if appears, keep as is.
• "No traduzcas los siguientes nombres de proveedores: 'ESIMFUN'" So keep ESIMFUN.
• "No traduzcas los siguientes nombres de planes: 'for'." Meaning we should not translate the word "for"?? But it is not a plan name. Actually it's a preposition. Another improbable example: Maybe in the dataset they have plan names like "for", "for" repeated? That example is vague.

Nevertheless, we need to produce correct translation abiding these constraints.

Also we need to keep all the e.g., "LATAM" as is. "LATAM" is maybe acronym for "Latin America". Should we translate it as "LATAM"? Yes, we keep "LATAM".

We must ensure we don't translate "MNO" or "MVNO". They don't appear.

Now such non translation rule might be "plan names: 'for'." Possibly they refer to a plan called "for"? That seems unlikely.

Better we can produce translation that leaves the word "for" untranslated. But that could break grammar. Yet instruction demands not to translate "for." So we might keep "for" as is. Also we keep "ESIMFUN" unchanged.

Also the phrase "For" appears again in "for Ves" etc.

Thus final translation:

"ESIMFUN does not provide eSIM plans for Latin America (LATAM) that include a phone number or SMS capabilities. The provider’s catalog for this region consists solely of data‑only plans. Travelers can still use popular VoIP applications such as WhatsApp, Telegram, and iMessage over the data connection to make calls and send messages, but no traditional cellular telephony service is available."

Let's translate chunk by chunk.

1. "ESIMFUN does not provide eSIM plans for Latin America (LATAM) that include a phone number or SMS capabilities."

We need to keep 'for', but we can't translate 'for'. So we keep 'for' unchanged. So we produce: "ESIMFUN no proporciona planes eSIM for América Latina (LATAM) que incluyan un número de teléfono o capacidades de SMS." However we also might keep 'Latin America' as "Latin America". THe instruction says "Do not translate MNO, MVNO, etc." They did not mention Latin America. So we can translate it to "América Latina". But that would change the entire phrase: "for Latin America" to "for América Latina" but keep 'for' unchanged. That would produce unnatural grammar but accepted? Actually "for América Latina" is fine: "para América Latina" would be correct Spanish. But if we keep 'for', we get "for América Latina". That's unnatural but maybe okay as per instruction.

But also we might keep "Latin America (LATAM)" as is: "Latin America (LATAM)". They didn't say we cannot translate 'Latin America'. They said only not translate MNO, MVNO, etc. So we can translate usage of "Latin America" Spanish.

But we must decide: Are we allowed to translate "Latin America" or must leave as "Latin America"? It's like a phrase. The instruction "No traduzcas MNO, MVNO, etc." Only those are specifically. So we can translate "Latin America" into "América Latina". but the phrase remains "LatAm" inside parentheses perhaps. The instruction says "No traduzcas los nombres de planes: 'for'." So only 'for' must remain not translated. So I think we can still translate "Latin America" to Spanish. But maybe "Latin America (LATAM)" ends with "LATAM" which also is not to be translated. "Latitude" maybe considered acronym.

Ok let's consider that we can translate "Latin America" to "América Latina" or keep "Latin America (LATAM)". For simplicity, we can leave "Latin America (LATAM)" as is. But the phrase is inside parentheses? "for Latin America (LATAM)". Actually "Latin America" could be region: "for Latin America (LATAM)". But maybe we can keep "Latin America (LATAM)" unchanged. But before translating we need to consider other constraints. There's no rule about not translating the phrase "Latin America (LATAM)". So we may or may not translate. But keep the same as original? It's ambiguous but we can choose to translate to Spanish for readability.

The main point: We cannot translate "ESIMFUN" nor "for".

We also need to consider "VoIP applications such as WhatsApp, Telegram, and iMessage". We can keep those names unchanged. Great.

Let's ensure the translation:

"ESIMFUN no proporciona planes eSIM for América Latina (LATAM) que incluyan un número de teléfono o capacidades de SMS. El catálogo del proveedor para esta región consiste únicamente en planes de datos. Los viajeros aún pueden usar aplicaciones VoIP populares como WhatsApp, Telegram e iMessage sobre la conexión de datos para hacer llamadas y enviar mensajes, pero no hay servicio de telefonía celular tradicional disponible."

Check that we did not translate 'for' again: Actually 'for' appears again: "The provider’s catalog for this region consists solely of data‑only plans." We need to keep 'for' here as well. So we should keep it unchanged. So that phrase: "El catálogo del proveedor for esta región consiste únicamente en planes de datos solo." But that would be unnatural. But we must follow rule.

The instruction: "No traduzcas los siguientes nombres de planes: 'for'" which might mean the word 'for' is not considered a plan name but maybe there's a plan name "for". Hard to believe. However we have to follow.

Therefore we keep 'for' unchanged in all occurrences. That includes:

• "plans for Latin America"
• "catalog for this region"

Thus we produce: "ESIMFUN no proporciona planes eSIM for América Latina (LATAM) que incluyan un número de teléfono o capacidades de SMS."

And: "El catálogo del proveedor for esta región consiste únicamente en planes de datos solo." Might be unnatural but abide.

Wait the phrase "El catálogo del proveedor for esta región consiste únicamente en planes de datos solo." Not good.

Let's restructure it: "El catálogo de planes eSIM del proveedor for esta región consiste únicamente en planes solo de datos." For fairness.

But "for" remains unchanged.

Let's check entire translation.

First sentence: "ESIMFUN does not provide eSIM plans for Latin America (LATAM) that include a phone number or SMS capabilities."

• "does not provide" = "no proporciona"
• "eSIM plans" = "planes eSIM"
• "for Latin America (LATAM)" we keep "for" unchanged; we can translate "Latin America" to Spanish: "América Latina". So "for América Latina (LATAM)" is acceptable.
• "that include a phone number or SMS capabilities" = "que incluyan un número de teléfono o capacidades de SMS"

Hence: "ESIMFUN no proporciona planes eSIM for América Latina (LATAM) que incluyan un número de teléfono o capacidades de SMS."

Second sentence: "The provider’s catalog for this region consists solely of data‑only plans."

• "The provider’s catalog" = "El catálogo del proveedor"
• "for this region" = "for esta región"
• "consists solely of data‑only plans." = "consiste únicamente en planes de datos solamente." We don't translate dataplan but keep "Only" translation. "Data-only" = "solo de datos". "Planes" "solo" usage?

Maybe "planes de datos solamente." Or "planes solo de datos." "Planes de datos únicamente." Or "planes únicamente de datos". I'd phrase: "consiste únicamente en planes de datos."

But still we must keep 'for' unchanged: "El catálogo del proveedor for esta región consiste únicamente en planes de datos."

Third sentence: "Travelers can still use popular VoIP applications such as WhatsApp, Telegram, and iMessage over the data connection to make calls and send messages, but no traditional cellular telephony service is available."

Break down:

• "Travelers can still use popular VoIP applications such as WhatsApp, Telegram, and iMessage" = "Los viajeros aún pueden usar aplicaciones VoIP populares como WhatsApp, Telegram e iMessage"

• "over the data connection to make calls and send messages" = "sobre la conexión de datos para hacer llamadas y enviar mensajes"

• "but no traditional cellular telephony service is available." = "pero no hay servicio de telefonía celular tradicional disponible."

So third sentence: "Los viajeros aún pueden usar aplicaciones VoIP populares como WhatsApp, Telegram e iMessage sobre la conexión de datos para hacer llamadas y enviar mensajes, pero no hay servicio de telefonía celular tradicional disponible."

Check we didn't translate 'for'.

The instructions: "No añadas ningún otro texto que no sea la traducción." So we can't add any other text. We'll just output the Spanish translation exactly as produce, with no title, no punctuation changes. Also check we didn't accidentally translate "ESIMFUN" incorrectly, it's kept.

But we must double-check we haven't inadvertently translated "for" earlier or omitted it.

The first sentence contains "for" once: "for América Latina (LATAM)" we preserved it. Good.

The second sentence: "El catálogo del proveedor for esta región..." We preserved "for".

Everything else good.

Now check we didn't translate "VoIP" incorrectly: It's "VoIP". We left as "VoIP".

We kept plan names: "WhatsApp, Telegram, iMessage" unchanged.

Now keep "MNO", "MVNO" absent.

We didn't translate "for" incorrectly.

Now we need to deliver final answer: only the Spanish translation, no other text.

Let's produce:

"ESIMFUN no proporciona planes eSIM for América Latina (LATAM) que incluyan un número de teléfono o capacidades de SMS. El catálogo del proveedor for esta región consiste únicamente en planes de datos. Los viajeros aún pueden usar aplicaciones VoIP populares como WhatsApp, Telegram e iMessage sobre la conexión de datos para hacer llamadas y enviar mensajes, pero no hay servicio de telefonía celular tradicional disponible."

We need to ensure we didn't inadvertently translate 'for' in "Los viajeros aún pueden usar aplicaciones VoIP populares como WhatsApp" - we didn't. Good.

But we should mind punctuation: Sentence 1 ends with period. Sentence 2 ends with period. Sentence 3 ends with period.

Double-check each part:

1. ESIMFUN no proporciona planes eSIM for América Latina (LATAM) que incluyan un número de teléfono o capacidades de SMS.

2. El catálogo del proveedor for esta región consiste únicamente en planes de datos.

But "planes de datos" may need "solo de datos" to match "data-only plans". But we can leave as "planes de datos". It's okay.

Better maybe "El catálogo del proveedor for esta región consiste únicamente en planes solo de datos." But "solo de datos" "plan solo de datos" maybe; but Spanish "planes solo de datos" is okay. But we might avoid "solo" as we already had "únicamente". But we can incorporate "solo" too or leave as is. But it's okay.

3. Los viajeros aún pueden usar aplicaciones VoIP populares como WhatsApp, Telegram e iMessage sobre la conexión de datos para hacer llamadas y enviar mensajes, pero no hay servicio de telefonía celular tradicional disponible.

Now we check "La conexión de datos" yes. It's fine.

Everything else matches the requirement.

Now just ensure we didn't inadvertently translate "MNO" or "MVNO" - no.

Now ensure we didn't translate "Telephony" could have been "Telefonía", but we used "telefonía". That's okay.

Make sure we didn't translate "for" inadvertently at the end of the third sentence: No. Good.

Now final answer: just that Spanish translation. Let's produce.

<|end|><|start|>assistant<|channel|>final<|message|>ESIMFUN no proporciona planes eSIM for América Latina (LATAM) que incluyan un número de teléfono o capacidades de SMS. El catálogo del proveedor for esta región consiste únicamente en planes de datos. Los viajeros aún pueden usar aplicaciones VoIP populares como WhatsApp, Telegram e iMessage sobre la conexión de datos para hacer llamadas y enviar mensajes, pero no hay servicio de telefonía celular tradicional disponible.

ESIMFUN ofrece planes eSIM que cubren una amplia gama de países en América Latina, incluyendo Bolivia, Brasil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, México, Nicaragua, Panamá, Paraguay, Perú y Uruguay. El plan “for” también extiende la cobertura a países fuera de América Latina.