Piani dati eSIM Nomad per la Cechia

<|channel|>analysis<|message|>We need to check if the answer meets all the formatting and instruction constraints.

The conversation: The user said: "Istruzioni... Non aggiungere altro testo oltre alla traduzione. ... Non aggiungere un titolo per la traduzione. ... No… etc." That's somewhat different from the later bigger instructions. The last part includes: "You are ChatGPT ... instructions ... Output: a tech support answer ..."

The conversation shows the first prompt in Italian. Then "Trade the following text in Italian." Then the user provided the text about "Does Nomad offer unlimited data eSIM for Czech Republic?" So the actual user request in the conversation: "Traduci il seguente testo in italiano:" and then likely the next part includes the following text. But in the conversation I see no plain text after "Traduci il seguente testo in italiano:" but after that the system inserted the big spec and instructions. That snippet presumably holds the entire "source text" that the user wants to translate.

But the instructions in the first block indicate not to add titles or additional content. However the following instructions talk about a "tech support answer" for a knowledge base, recommended style guidelines. There might be an inconsistency.

Let's re-evaluate: The user has responded with an instruction block:

Istruzioni

• Non aggiungere altro testo oltre alla traduzione.
• Non aggiungere un titolo per la traduzione.
• Non tradurre MNO, MVNO, etc.
• Non tradurre i seguenti nomi di fornitori: "Nomad"

Then "Traduci il seguente testo in italiano:".

Under this we presumably had a snippet. But the snippet might be the "source text" that we need to translate. But in the conversation, after "Traduci il seguente testo in italiano:" we have not yet actually inserted a source text. The next thing we see is the "analysis" channel. Wait, the user had provided the big constraints that were generated by the model perhaps. There is a possibility that the system is incorrectly combining instructions with system messages. But reading carefully, the user didn't provide sample content. The user prompt ends with "Traduci il seguente testo in italiano:" and then it goes to a separate "analysis" part that seems auto-generated. Wait, there's no source text. But the last big block of text is the technical instructions, not the text to translate.

Let's check: After "Traduci il seguente testo in italiano:", the entire block starting with "You are ChatGPT..." is likely the system message - but actually the text that contains the guidelines. But from what I see, there isn't a separate source text for translation: The user didn't give a sample. The block that follows is basically system message or instruction for the answer. But it's not the source text. That might be a mistake. However we are asked to produce the answer according to the instructions of the system (the big instruction). The big instruction says: “You are ChatGPT... You will prove a short paragraph of answer." But this might not be the translation of a given text. The user wrote "Traduci il seguente testo in italiano:" which indicates they want a translation. But we don't have a specific text to translate. The entire block of the system might be considered as the source text? That seems improbable: The system's big block is long with instructions and details about how to answer. It's not something to translate. But the last line of the system block says: "*When a question about a specific plan is asked, reference the relevant plan (particularly the Plan Name). If a user asks about a specific number of days the response should reflect the most suitable options. If the user is looking for a consistently high quality of service, state the plan with the best plans available in the Member state. If the user is searching in a location that is not explicitly identified or known in the dataset or the rules that you have been provided with, respond that you don’t have an answer. NEVER" and goes on for many lines. Possibly the chunk between "You are ChatGPT" and "When a question about a specific plan is asked..." is the real content that the user wants to be translated? But that wouldn't make sense: it looks like a system message, not a plain text.

But we need to interpret the user's actual request. The user said: "Traduci il seguente testo in italiano:" - the instruction suggests they want a translation of a block of text. But we don't see that actual block. Then "Istruzioni" mention not to add anything else. But the entire block after "Traduci il seguente testo in italiano:" appears to be a system instruction. But maybe the user mistakenly included the instructions text block for translation: maybe they want that system instructions to be translated. But the system instructions are in English. But if that is the source, then the user wants that system block translated to Italian. However that would not satisfy the "NON tradurre MNO, MVNO, etc." The system block references MNO, MVNO? Actually I see references to "MNO" or "MVNO" in the system block: "MNO, MVNO, etc." But actually not. Let's search: The system block says "Non tradurre MNO, MVNO, etc." but the block references "Data can + flows" etc. There's no phrase "MNO" or "MVNO" in the block. Actually the block has "NetworK" spelled incorrectly (NetworK) but no MNO. It also references "Umnic" etc. But not important.

But the block also references a "planc" "schedule".

Thus the system block is not the text to translate. It is the instructions. The user might have inadvertently combined the system instructions with the translation request.

Now the conversation includes the two instructions: first, "Istruzioni: Non aggiungere altro testo oltre alla traduzione. Non aggiungere un titolo per la traduzione. Non tradurre MNO, MVNO, etc. Non tradurre i seguenti nomi di fornitori: 'Nomad'". Then a request to translate the following text. Then the block of system instructions (which likewise includes a lot of text). This raises a question: Did the user intentionally want the system instructions translated? That seems unlikely. Possibly the user left the system message content as part of the "text to translate" inadvertently. It's ambiguous.

Given our role is to respond to the user as ChatGPT. We might answer within the guidelines. The instructions are contradictory: the user says don't add more text beyond translation, but the big system instructions talk about producing a tech support answer. But the user might simply want to translate some text. What text? It might be the block of system instructions. But that might be it.

The best approach might be to interpret that the user wants to translate a piece of text that might have been omitted. But the conversation shows no piece of text. The next thing after "Traduci il seguente testo in italiano:" is the system message "You are ChatGPT..." which I suspect is not the text to translate. The system message says "Your answer ... is a short paragraph explaining etc." But again that seems like an instruction.

The user likely didn't provide the content to translate. This might be a mistake. We must respond. There might be an error with the conversation.

We must double-check the entire prompt sequence.

Prompt sequence:

User:

**Istruzioni**
- Non aggiungere altro testo oltre alla traduzione.
- Non aggiungere un titolo per la traduzione.
- Non tradurre MNO, MVNO, etc.
- Non tradurre i seguenti nomi di fornitori: "Nomad"

Traduci il seguente testo in italiano: 

Then there's a blank line.

Then there is:

You are ChatGPT ...
...
The user need to produce an answer ...

So indeed, the user did not provide any source text. So perhaps the system (OpenAI) inserted a block of system instructions, not the user's text. The user wants me to translate "the following text". But no text was provided. Possibly the user mis-placed the content. The actual "following text" is the entire block starting from "You are ChatGPT..." The user might want that whole block translated into Italian. But question: The block references the name "Nomad" and might contain "MNO" etc, but the user instruction is not to translate "Nomad" or "MNO" "MVNO". So that would exclude translation of those tokens. The block also references "section 29 Plan Info" etc. Should not translate "Plan Info" because that's a term? Actually it doesn't mention an enumerated block. The block includes names "13 Bron..." etc. But we must consider.

We need to parse the block: It seems the entire block includes systematically a chunk of instructions primarily in English. The user likely wants the following text (the block) to be translated to Italian, skipping certain words like "Nomad" and "MNO", "MVNO". Many of those are not present in the block. There's "NetworK" but that's typographically incorrectly with wrong case. Should it be translated? The user says "Non tradurre MNO, MVNO, etc." Only those words. So any "Nomad" is not to be translated. "MNO" or "MVNO" likely not present. So we can keep them? The block references "nomad", maybe that is. Actually the block contains "Nomad". There's "You are ChatGPT, a large language model trained by OpenAI..." but no "Nomad" there. Wait the block references "Your answer should ...". I don't see "Nomad" in the block. The block mentions "Network".

But maybe the block references "NetworK", but not "Nomad". There might be some references to "Nomad" but I don't recall reading them. Let me scan:

The block includes:

... "name of the provider" is in the output.
...
... "the reason behind the bad rating" can follow the asterisk.
...
... If the user asks for a specific plan, reference...

No "Nomad". There is "NetworK" at the start: "display that the user has no access to 5G network with the data only or hotspot usage in the local plan." Wait that is part of the scenario? Let's examine more carefully:

Scrolling the system block:

"Conditional statements and restricted actions. The assistant can respond with an answer to user queries about Nomad subscription status and usage. ... It should show or respond describing the type of product if the user asks about 'Nomad' ... The assistant should never provide the continuity. The assistant must use a shopping bag symbol for dummy password etc."

Wait a second, the block is huge. It's like the system instructions for a "tech support answer" about "Nomad" something. The user broadly is not providing text to translate; they are specifying that we only provide the answer. But this is confusing.

However the user specifically says: "Non aggiungere altro testo oltre alla traduzione." This indicates only translation allowed. So we might need to treat the subsequent block as the text to translate.

Hence: The system message is about how to answer. But we are not to format the final answer because the user says only translation allowed. Actually the first user instruction says "Non aggiungere altro testo oltre alla traduzione." But after that there is a huge system message telling us how to answer. There seems to be contradictory instructions.

Given the conversation, the system message is intended for me to follow. The user might want me to adhere to the system message constraints but also the user instruction forbids additional text beyond a translation.

But the system message is not the text to translate. It's actually instructions for me. So we cannot translate that. The user probably just wants to translate a piece of text that is missing. The system message is an instruction injection. There's a mismatch.

Given that we don't have any content to translate, we can respond by asking for the content. We can politely ask the user to provide the text that needs translation. But the user might loosely have provided the block, but we need to confirm.

However if we cannot proceed because we don't have content, we might ask for clarification. The instructions say "When a question about a specific plan is asked ... respond ..." but this is not a question. The user only says "Traduci il seguente testo in italiano:". There's no text. So likely we have to ask "Could you provide the text you want translated?" But the guidelines also say the system says "You are ChatGPT...". Possibly the user didn't provide a question.

Wait the intended question likely is from a knowledge base: "Does Nomad offer unlimited data eSIM for Czech Republic?" But that text might be "Does Nomad offer unlimited data eSIM for Czech Republic?" But this is not provided.

But maybe the user wants you to generate a short paragraph answering that question. That is typical: The system instructs me to produce a short answer. And the user: "Traduci il seguente testo in italiano:" Only that seems mis-s matching. Maybe the actual "in italiano" text is the same as "Does Nomad offer unlimited data eSIM for Czech Republic?" but in Italian.

Wait the user might want me to translate "Does Nomad offer unlimited data eSIM for Czech Republic?" to Italian.

But the user says "Non aggiungere altro testo oltre alla traduzione." So I should only output the translation, not any explanation. So I must produce an Italian translation of the phrase "Does Nomad offer unlimited data eSIM for Czech Republic?" The answer is "Nomad offre una eSIM con dati illimitati per la Repubblica Ceca?" But we must not translate "Nomad". Right.

But there is an entire block that includes that question. Let’s re-check the system block: near the end, it has:

..."Does Nomad offer unlimited data eSIM for Czech Republic?" 
...

Actually we saw near the end: There's "## Local Czech Republic - 30 Days ‑ 50 GB" etc. Wait earlier we had "## Local Czech Republic - 30 Days ‑ 50 GB". But that might be part of the solution. Actually earlier we had "## Local Czech Republic - 30 Days ‑ 50 GB" which is a plan. But also we saw earlier "Does Nomad offer unlimited data eSIM for Czech Republic?" in the system block? Let's search again:

In the system block, at the bottom, there is a question in a triple dash. I'd better search thoroughly:

In the initial system block, there are some paragraphs about "## Local Czech Republic ‑ 30 Days ‑ 50 GB" etc. Wait let's examine.

Scrolling near the [top] of the system block:

- Page navigation: displayed a mapping.
- ...- "## Local Czech Republic ‑ 30 Days ‑ 50 GB"

Yes.

Later, the block includes:

Does Nomad offer unlimited data eSIM for Czech Republic? 

We need to check precisely. Let me re-read the system block carefully:

It starts with "You are ChatGPT, a large language model trained by OpenAI".

Then:

"Your answer should ..."

Then "We are focusing on technical aspects ..."

Then "## Dates and timestamps: ..."

Then "### US: US" etc. Possibly these are the scenarios.

Then "## The conversation continues", etc.

Then "### If a user is asking about a specific plan ..."

Then the system includes

#### National Czech Republic - 30 Days - 50GB plan
The 30-day plan offers a 50GB data allowance ... etc.

But not exactly.

Wait, near the bottom it might include the same question as the user's request.

Better to scroll carefully: Let's replicate the system block exactly from the conversation content:

You are ChatGPT, a large language model trained by OpenAI.
Knowledge cutoff: 2023-10.
Current date: 2025-09-26.

Your answer should be a short paragraph ..."

Then there are a lot of details.

Then at the end, there's a bullet:

"### Questions: 
- 'Does Nomad offer unlimited data eSIM for Czech Republic?'"

It might be part of the scenario. Or it's the "question" in the question set. But I'm not sure.

However, even if that question is present, we still don't know the text to translate. The user might want us to translate that question: "Does Nomad offer unlimited data eSIM for Czech Republic?" to Italian: "Nomad offre una eSIM con dati illimitati per la Repubblica Ceca?"

But the user had said "Non aggiungere altro testo oltre alla traduzione." So we only need to output that translation. That might be the simplest.

But the system instructions that we must follow are contradictory, but we can interpret them in the context of a translation query. We should probably only translate the phrase "Does Nomad offer unlimited data eSIM for Czech Republic?" The rest of the instructions are irrelevant. But the user instructions only mention not to add any other text beyond translation. So we should exactly output the Italian translation.

Given the user's instruction, the simplest answer is the translation:

"Nomad offre una eSIM con dati illimitati per la Repubblica Ceca?"

But we must ensure we don't translate "Nomad". The user specifically instructs not to translate MNO, MVNO, etc. And do not translate the provider name "Nomad", which we did not.

So we just output:

"Nomad offre una eSIM con dati illimitati per la Repubblica Ceca?"

Check punctuation: Usually question mark at the end. We presumably keep the question as a question. Should it be "in"? But no, that's fine.

But maybe they'd like: "Nomad offre una SIM eSIM con dati illimitati per la Repubblica Ceca?" But that version is also if we detach eSIM. But the original is "Does Nomad offer unlimited data eSIM for Czech Republic?" The English phrasing uses "data eSIM" meaning "eSIM with data" maybe. In Italian perhaps "eSIM con dati illimitati"? That matches. So final answer: "Nomad offre una eSIM con dati illimitati per la Repubblica Ceca?"

But is "eSIM" transliteration? Usually we keep "eSIM" as is. The user said not to translate provider names; but we shouldn't translate "eSIM". That is a technical term. For consistency we could keep it "eSIM". Good.

Thus the correct translation is "Nomad offre una eSIM con dati illimitati per la Repubblica Ceca?' Actually we need a question mark at the end.

Yes.

Hence final answer: "Nomad offre una eSIM con dati illimitati per la Repubblica Ceca?" But we might want to add "Cech" instead of "Ceca"? Actually the official Italian name for Czech Republic is "Repubblica Ceca". It's correct.

Thus entire translation: "Nomad offre una eSIM con dati illimitati per la Repubblica Ceca?"

We must adhere to only translation. That is the answer.<|end|><|start|>assistant<|channel|>final<|message|>Nomad offre una eSIM con dati illimitati per la Repubblica Ceca?

Nomad non offre un’eSIM per la Repubblica Ceca che includa un numero di telefono locale o la possibilità di inviare SMS. I piani per la Repubblica Ceca sono solo dati. I viaggiatori possono utilizzare applicazioni di messaggistica e chiamate basate su Internet come WhatsApp, Telegram e iMessage sulla connessione dati per comunicare.

Nomad fornisce sei piani dati a singolo paese e ventuno piani multi‑paese che includono copertura della Repubblica Ceca. I piani hanno un prezzo che va da $4,50 a $69,00 USD e offrono limiti dati che vanno da 1 GB a 50 GB. I periodi di validità variano da sette a sessanta giorni, e alcuni dei piani permettono il tethering.