ドイツ向けKeepgo eSIMデータプラン

<|channel|>analysis<|message|>We need to produce an answer that follows the guidelines. Let's restate the problem: We need to answer: "Keepgoはドイツ向けに無制限データeSIMを提供していますか？" In other words, does Keepgo offer unlimited data eSIM for Germany? According to the dataset, there are plans for "Corvus Europe" (100GB or 50GB), "Antares Europe" (50GB), "Tucana" (50GB), "Auriga 35 Most Visited" (50GB). Each has "Unlimited" validity. But the "Data cap" column shows 100GB, 50GB, etc. None are truly unlimited; they are capped at some amount. Data cap is defined as the maximum amount of high-speed data. In the guidelines, "Data cap = unlimited" is used only if the data cap is "unlimited." The dataset shows only 100 and 50 GB data caps. So there is no unlimited data plan. The answer should state that Keepgo does not have an unlimited data eSIM plan for Germany, but has large-sized data plans 50GB or 100GB. According to guidelines: "無制限データプランが提供されていないことを明確に述べる。" "代替として定量データプランが利用可能であることを伝え、データセットから1〜2つの例を簡潔に紹介する。なお、補足までに、データセットに含まれるプランはあくまで大容量データプランを優先的に選んだものであり、利用可能なプランの全リストではないことに注意して扱うこと。"

The user asked: Keepgo provides unlimited data eSIM for Germany? So answer: No.

We use Japanese, natural language; no headings or lists. Provide 1 or 2 paragraphs. Use neutral tone. Use network type "3G, 4G, 5G" but technical. The dataset shows network type for all: "3G, 5G, LTE". We should mention that. "Max speed" and "Reduced speed" not provided, so we can't mention. We can't mention other types. Only mention that these plans are 50GB or 100GB.

We also must not mention "dataset" or any reference to dataset, no repeated content. We must not mention "unlimited data plans" incorrectly. The question is about unlimited. So answer: No unlimited plan. Instead, large data plans.

Additionally, guidelines: "データセットに含まれるプランはあくまで大容量データプランを優先的に選んだものであり、利用可能なプランの全リストではないことに注意して扱うこと." So we should mention that we are only giving some large data plans. But we are not required to mention "the dataset" or "dataset" explicitly. But it says "データセットに含まれるプランはあくまで大容量データプランを優先的に選んだものであり、利用可能なプランの全リストではないことに注意して扱うこと." But we shouldn't mention "dataset." There's a conflict: guidelines says not to mention dataset, but also states we must note that the plans we present are not the full list. The instruction says "回答中で「データセット」や「提供された情報」などに一切触れず". So we cannot say "the dataset." We need to mention that we are only listing large capacity options for demonstration. How to phrase that? We cannot mention dataset. So we should say "以下は大容量データプランの例です。" That is fine. But we should avoid mentioning "data" as dataset. We can say "いくつかの例として" etc. That's allowed.

We need to talk about "最大速度" and "Reduced speed" but not given. We can mention we don't have that info. But guidelines require that if available, we should mention. But it's not in dataset, so we can't mention. Just not mention.

Now, ensure the answer is in Japanese, no headings, no list format. Also no bullet points.

We need to produce 1 or 2 paragraphs. Let's write two paragraphs:

Paragraph 1: Clear statement that there is no unlimited plan. Provide that Keepgo offers 50GB and 100GB plans for Germany. Might mention validity is unlimited (i.e., indefinite). We can mention network types: 3G, 5G, LTE. Also mention that t <. But we must abide by guidelines: "5G", "4G", "3G" with no space between numeric and unit. We need to emphasize "5G, LTE" etc. "LTE" is not a number. But network type should be "5G, 4G, 3G". The entries show "3G, 5G, LTE", but we can't correct it. We may keep as "3G, 5G, LTE" because we can't change the content. But guidelines: "ネットワークタイプは「5G」「4G」「3G」" So they want a format of "5G, 4G, 3G" but "LTE" fudge. Should we adjust? The dataset shows LTE, which is a network type but not numeric. It's okay. We don't necessarily need to follow that exactly. We may just reflect the dataset. But we could restructure as "3G, 5G, LTE". It's fine.

Second paragraph: discuss that large capacity plans are cost-effective for most users unless they need extreme data usage. Provide example: Corvus Europe 100GB ($165) and 50GB ($97). And that they have no unlimited cap. Summarize that for most users, the paid large data plans will suffice. We can mention that there is no unlimited plan; the existing ones are capped.

Also we must not mention "無制限データプラン" incorrectly. So "Unlimited" refers to validity. So we can mention that "validity is unlimited" but not data cap.

Let's draft:

Paragraph 1: Keepgo offers 50GB and 100GB data plans for Germany. They have unlimited validity, meaning the plan can be used repeatedly within that period. They support 3G, 5G, LTE. The data caps are 50GB or 100GB.

Paragraph 2: Since no unlimited data plan exists, users who need large amounts may choose the 100GB plan ($165) or the 50GB plan ($97). For most travelers, the 50GB plan provides good cost performance; larger capacity will cost more proportionally.

Be careful: We must avoid saying "All" or "no other plan" conflict. We must note that presented are only examples, not exhaustive. So include a sentence: "以下は代表的な例であり、他にも利用可能な選択肢があります." But guidelines say "回答は必ずKeepgoのみに焦点を当て、他のプロバイダーについては言及しないでください." So we can mention other options within Keepgo. So we mention: "その他にも複数のデータ容量オプションがあることがあります。"

Be careful: we cannot mention "dataset" or "提供された情報". So we must not explicitly refer. Just say "以下に例を示します". Ok.

The answer should be 1-2 paragraphs, so likely 1-2. We'll produce 2.

Ensure neutral tone, no question repeating. Not mention "dataset" or "data set". Just such. No headers or bullet lists. Use "ただし、". Ok.

Write the answer.

Check formatting: roman characters for "$". Yes.

Also mention "最大速度" and "制限速度"? We don't have that data, so we skip.

Check technical terms: "5G, 4G, 3G" we have only "5G, 3G, LTE". We can say "3G, 5G, LTE". But keep it consistent with dataset.

Ok write final answer.

<|end|><|start|>assistant<|channel|>final<|message|>Keepgoでは、ドイツで利用できるデータ容量は50GBと100GBのプランのみで、無制限データプランは提供されていません。これらのプランは有効期間が「Unlimited（無制限）」で、利用開始日から無期限にデータを使用できるという特徴があります。サポートされるネットワーク種別は3G、5G、LTEで、ドイツ国内だけでなく対象国（34〜105カ国）で利用可能です。

代表的な例として、Corvus Europe 100GBプランは$165で、Corvus Europe 50GBプランは$97です。これらは定量データプランであり、データ量が多い場合でもコストパフォーマンスが高い選択肢となります。大容量データを必要とするユーザーでない限り、定量データプランのほうが経済的です。なお、ここに挙げたのは主に大容量の例であり、Keepgoには他にもさまざまな容量オプションが存在します。

Keepgoでは、ドイツ向けに電話番号付きやSMS機能を持つeSIMプランは提供していません。
すべてのプランはデータ通信専用であり、音声通話やSMSの機能は含まれていません。そのため、通話やメッセージを利用したい場合は、LINE、Facebook Messenger、iMessageなどのデータ通信で動作するVoIPアプリの使用がおすすめです。

Keepgoはドイツ向けに国別プランを提供していません。代わりに、40種類の複数国プランが利用可能で、これらにはドイツを含むさまざまな国で有効です。ほとんどのプランは定量データプランで、データ容量は100 MBから100 GBまであり、価格は0 USDから400 USDの範囲で設定されています。使用期限は無期限プランもありますが、7日間の短期有効プランも用意されており、テザリングを許可する選択肢や新規ユーザー向けの特典が付いたプランもあります。