マダガスカル向けGiga.Tel eSIMデータプラン

<|channel|>analysis<|message|>We have a user request: "Giga.Telはマダガスカル向けに無制限データeSIMを提供していますか？" They want an answer according to guidelines: concise (1-2 paragraphs), neutral, no headings, no lists. Should not mention data set or instructions. Should answer: "No, Giga.Tel does not offer unlimited data plans for Madagascar; they have daily 1GB/day unlimited in name but it's capped, with reduced speed after overage. Instead, they offer high-capacity data plans 20GB etc." Also the guidelines said the "unlimited-plan-rules" section: if unlimited data plan exists only indicates unlimited; but since Giga.Tel dataset shows "Global Unlimited 5 Days" etc but they have 1GB/day so it's capped. They are described as "hasUnlimitedName = true" but data cap is 1GB/day, not truly unlimited. They mention "unlimited" but actually capacity is 1GB/day and after that speed is reduced. So answer: Giga.Tel does not have truly unlimited plan. Provide example 20GB plans like Global Special 20GB 365 days priced $70.49 etc. But guideline: provide 1-2 examples. Not mention dataset, but mention they provide high-capacity plans like 20GB. Probably use numbers: 20GB for 365 days at $70.49, or 30 days 20GB at $143.99. Also mention that if you need block 1GB/day per day but they'd treat as unlimited until speed slowed. They mention mention that for large data usage, high-capacity plan is better cost wise. Also mention that "hasUnlimitedName = true" but having limited 1GB/day means not true unlimited.

So answer should include that: Giga.Tel does not provide truly unlimited data eSIM for Madagascar. Instead, they have daily 1GB/day "Unlimited" but that is actually limited, speed reduces to 512kbps after over. Alternative large capacity 20GB plans available: e.g., 20GB for 365 days ($70.49) and 20GB for 30 days ($143.99). Provide no headings or bullet lists.

Be neutral and descriptive.

Also guidelines: "train of thought: The output must have 1 or 2 paragraphs, not more." So okay.

Make sure not to mention "terrestrial" or "data set" or "Giga set".

We must not mention "distribution" or "dataset". Keep to 1-2 paragraphs.

Also must not use bullet list or headings. Just plain text.

Also must not mention "Giga.Tel" or "provide unlimited" phrase? They instruct: "回答にタイトルは付けず、回答の本文のみを出力". They say "eSIMプロバイダー名は日本語にはせず、英語のまま使用すること". So we must use "Giga.Tel" not romanized or Japanese. So "Giga.Tel" is fine.

We must not mention "Data set" or "provided info". We must not mention "data set" or "dataset".

Also use "Unlimited" or "無制限" only if in plan name. But we only have plan names like "Global Unlimited 5 Days" etc. But mention that plan is technically limited.

Now produce 1-2 paragraph answer.

Make it neutral. Also mention "定量データプラン" like 20GB. But they gave price: $70.49 and $143.99. Should mention both. Maybe mention one only. But guidelines: "プラン名に「Unlimited」や「無制限」が含まれているがデータ容量に上限があるプランの場合、それは常時高速データ通信可能な無制限データではないことを明記する。通常速度で使えるデータ量に上限があり、それを超えると速度が制限されるプランである。Reduced speedが指定されている場合は、その値が制限後の速度であることを追記する. 非常に大量のデータ通信を行うユーザーでない限り、定量データプランの方がコストパフォーマンスが高いことを説明する."

Thus we mention "Global Unlimited 5 Days" with 1GB/day, reduced speed 512kbps. Then a high-capacity plan: "Global Special 20GB" 365 days for $70.49, tethering allowed, no speed restriction? Usually might not mention reduced speed. Provide impetus.

But we must keep 1-2 paragraphs and not bullet lists. So we need to phrase sentences flow.

Probably:

"Giga.Tel does not have a truly unlimited data eSIM for Madagascar. Their plans labeled “Unlimited” are actually capped at 1 GB per day, and once that limit is reached the speed drops to 512 kbps. For users who require more data, Giga.Tel offers 20 GB plans, such as the Global Special 20 GB subscription, which provides 20 GB for 365 days at about $70, or the 20 GB plan for 30 days at $144. These large‑capacity plans are typically more cost‑effective for non‑heavy‑usage travelers." That's one paragraph. Could be one paragraph fits 1-2 paragraphs.

But guidelines: "回答は1つ、または2つの段落" So one paragraph is okay. But usually separate about unlimited and then about alternatives maybe separate paragraphs. But can integrate in one paragraph. But let's do two paragraphs: first about unlimited labeling, second about alternative.

Paragraph 1: "Giga.Tel offers plans for Madagascar that are titled ‘Unlimited’, but they have a daily cap of 1 GB; after this limit the speed drops to 512 kbps."

Paragraph 2: "For travelers who need more data, Giga.Tel provides 20 GB plans, for example Global Special 20 GB valid for 365 days at $70.49, or a 20 GB plan valid for 30 days at $143.99. These plans give a large amount of data without reducing speed and are more economical unless you need heavy usage."

However guidelines: "プラン名に「Unlimited」や「無制限」が含まれているがデータ容量に上限があるプランの場合、それは常時高速データ通信可能な無制限データではないことを明記する。通常速度で使えるデータ量に上限があり、それを超えると速度が制限されるプランである。Reduced speedが指定されている場合は、その値が制限後の速度であることを追記する。" So we mention "Reduced speed: 512 kbps".

Also mention "highest speed" might be "4G" for those plans, but we can mention "4G" network. For 20GB plan maybe "4G" as well. It's up to guidelines: network type "4G". So we can mention "Global Special 20GB" uses 4G network. But not necessary.

Also need to mention "全プランでは" or "利用可能"? We only mention examples.

We should also consider style: no mention of "we" or "I"? It's a neutral writing, no first person references.

Also "データ容量超過後の制限速度" is required. We'll do: "After 1 GB/day, speed reduces to 512 kbps".

We need to adhere to the "Use numbers and unit style: Data capacity: 1GB, 20GB. Speed? We use "512kbps" with no space. So good.

We'll form final output as 2 paragraphs:

Paragraph 1: "Giga.Telのマダガスカル向けeSIMで「Unlimited」と名付けられたプランは1 GB/日で上限に達すると速度が512kbpsに制限されるため、実際には無制限データは提供されていません。"

Paragraph 2: "無制限データが必要ない限り、20 GBの大容量プランの方がコストパフォーマンスが高いです。たとえば、Global Special 20 GBは365 days有効で70.49 USD、20 GB／30days有効で143.99 USDです。両方とも4Gネットワークで提供され、帯域幅制限はなく、必要なデータ量を確保できます。"

But remove Japanese "度"? Use Russian? Wait, we must use Japanese language with correct grammar, but keep plan names in English.

We need to keep in Japanese: "Giga.Telのマダガスカル向けeSIMで 'Unlimited' と名付けられたプランは..." This mixing English and Japanese is allowed.

But check guidelines: "eSIMプロバイダー名は日本語にはせず、英語のまま使用すること". So we can keep "Giga.Tel" in English. It's in Japanese text, but that is okay. For plan names: we can keep plan names as "Global Unlimited 5 Days" etc. For example, we can mention "Global Unlimited 5 Days" which has 1 GB/day and speeds drop to 512 kbps.

Also we can refer to "Global Special 20 GB" etc.

We need to be careful: we can't use bullet or headings. So just plain paragraph sentences.

Also note we can incorporate mention of "Reduced speed" attribute. For example: "Reduced speed: 512kbps". Ensure this is referenced.

Also mention: "長期利用の場合は20 GBプランの方が経済的" Good.

Let's craft:

Paragraph One:

"Giga.Telのマダガスカル向けeSIMで 'Unlimited' と名付けられたプランは実際には1 GB/日の上限が設定されており、その上限を超えると速度が512 kbpsに制限されます。従って、連続的に高速データ通信を利用したい場合は本質的に無制限データとは言えません。"

Paragraph Two:

"代わりに、大容量データが必要なユーザーには20 GBのプランが用意されています。例えば、Global Special 20 GBは365 days有効で70.49 USD、また20 GB／30days有効のプランは143.99 USDです。両プランとも4Gネットワークで提供され、速度制限なしで使えるため、通常の利用ではコストパフォーマンスが高い選択肢となります。"

But check guidelines: "データ容量超過後の制限速度" we mention 512 kbps indeed. We also mention "hasUnlimitedName = true" but no need. We also mention "Reduced speed" attribute directly.

Also we need to ensure no "I" or "we" first-person. It's fine.

We need to mention "tethering allowed" maybe mention for 20GB plan? Data set shows some plans have tethering allowed. But not all. Plan "Global Special 20GB" has "Tethering allowed". So we could mention it's allowed. But not required. But we can mention.

It might be good to mention "Tethering allowed" as a feature. But guidelines: features can be used. Good.

Thus final answer:

Paragraph 1: mention unlimited confusion.

Paragraph 2: mention high-capacity plan. Perhaps mention price and tethering.

Check for "フォーマットを統一" of network type: "4G" is fine. Data capacity: "1GB", "20GB". Price: in USD maybe mention $70.49, $143.99.

Ensure "1GB/Day"? The plan states "1GB/day (Unlimited)". This is a daily cap. So maybe mention that.

But guidelines: "データ容量は「1GB」「2GB」「10GB」（数字と単位の間にスペースなし）。期間は「1日」「7日」「30日」".

So mention "1GB/day" but we can say "1GB/日". But the formatting uses "1GB" for capacity. "1 day" format "1日". So for daily plan, maybe "1GB/日" but use "1GB" thus not correct. But could say "1GB/today" maybe.

But guidelines: Data cap can be described as "1GB". But the plan is 1GB, daily. So what to do? We can mention "Daily 1GB".

But guidelines for "Data cap" is about capacity. They said "数字と単位の間にスペースなし". So "1GB" is fine. For "期間" "1日". But we don't need to mention "days" in that sense. But for the plan we can say "1GB/day" or "1GB/日". But check guidelines: "期間は「1日」「7日」「30日」". So for durations we might use "5 days" => "5日". But we might not mention durations except to describe price. But okay.

We must ensure no "days" like "days" spelled out. Use Japanese "日" maybe. But it's not mandatory to show durations but we can mention "365 days" as "365日". But still okay.

We must use numeric and unit. The examples in dataset show "365 days" often. But we can mention "365 days" as "365日". "20GB" is fine. "70.49 USD" maybe OK but we can convert to Japanese? But we can keep USD.

We should provide a short answer: "Open".

Let's refine.

Paragraph 1:

"Giga.Telのマダガスカル向けeSIMで 'Unlimited' と称されるプランは、実際には1GB/日で上限が設定されており、上限を超えると速度が512kbpsに制限されます。従って、連続的に高速でデータ通信を行いたい場合は、本質的に無制限データとは言えません。"

But "1GB/日" uses slash? The guidelines didn't mention slash but allowed format. But we might use "1GB/日" to be clear.

But if we don't want to use slash, we can say "1GB/日" but that's okay.

Now paragraph 2:

"代わりに、大容量データが必要なユーザーには20GBのプランが利用できます。例えば、Global Special 20GBは1年（365日）有効で70.49USD、また20GB／30日有効のGlobal 20GBは143.99USDです。両プランは4Gネットワークで提供され、速度制限はなく、Tetheringも可能です。通常の利用ではコストパフォーマンスが高い選択肢となります。"

But we need to mention "Tethering allowed" to show features.

Check guidelines: "データセットに存在するプランはあくまで大容量データプランを優先的に選んだものであり、利用可能なプランの全リストではないことに注意して扱うこと". So mention that we just gave examples.

Also mention that for heavy usage, large plan best.

Also "計算" we don't need.

We must not mention "tethering" if guidelines didn't mention but it's a feature, still okay.

But check guidelines: "データ容量超過後の制限速度（Reduced speed）" maybe enough.

Also "利用可能日数（有効期間）" we might not need but could mention 365 days.

Now we should produce final answer. Let's craft with 2 paragraphs.

We must avoid pointing out instructions. Suppose we output:

"Giga.Telのマダガスカル向けeSIMで 'Unlimited' と名付けられたプランは、実際には1GB/日の上限が設定されており、その上限を超えると速度が512kbpsに制限されます。連続的に高速でデータ通信を行いたい場合は、本質的に無制限データとは言えません。

代わりに、より大容量が必要なユーザーには20GBのプランが用意されています。例えば、Global Special 20GBは1年（365日）有効で70.49USD、また20GB／30日有効のGlobal 20GBは143.99USDです。両プランとも4Gネットワークで提供され、速度制限なし、Tetheringも可能で、通常の利用ではコストパフォーマンスが高い選択肢となります。"

But guidelines: "回答は1つ、または2つの段落に簡潔にまとめること." It's okay. "Tethering allowed" as "Tetheringも可能". We could use "tethering allowed" but we used Japanese. It's okay.

Check that "1GB/日" has space? It's "1GB/日" no space. Good.

Now verify no mention "データセット" or "dataset" or "provided info". No. The writing uses "1GB/日" which is not referencing. No "we" or "I". It's about "Giga.Tel".

We must ensure we didn't mention "1GB/day" maybe with slash. But slash includes "日". It's okay.

Now check that we didn't use bullet list or headings. We used paragraphs.

Now but check "データセットに存在するプランはあくまで大容量データプランを優先的に選んだものであり、利用可能なプランの全リストではないことに注意して扱うこと." We implied that we just gave examples. Did we mention that? We didn't. But maybe it's okay to add: "これらは例示であり、全てのプランを網羅しているわけではありません。"

But guidelines: "代替として定量データプランが利用可能であることを伝え、データセットから1〜2つの例を簡潔に紹介する". We did that. But we should mention that these are just examples.

Should we explicitly say "以下の例は、データセットから抜粋したものです" but that might mention dataset. So better not. Instead, "例えば" may suffice.

We also must mention "hasUnlimitedName = true" but it's not necessary.

Now potential issues: The plan "Global Special 20 GB" is listed: "20GB, 365 days, $70.49", network "4G". "Global 20 GB" is "20GB, 30 days, $143.99" network "4G". So fine.

Also mention "Global 20GB" with tethering allowed. Yes.

We may mention "Global 20GB" maybe but we mention only "Global 20GB" is 30 day. But in the data set we have "Global 20 GB" plan.

Yes.

Now check the instruction: "プラン名に「Unlimited」や「無制限」が含まれているがデータ容量に上限があるプランの場合、それは常時高速データ通信可能な無制限データではないことを明記する." We did that: we said "Unlimited" indicates 1GB/day. Good.

Also mention "Reduced speed" value 512kbps for unlimited. We did: "512kbps".

Now we should check that we didn't mention "eSIMDB" or "comparison site" or "Providing service" etc.

Now also ensure we didn't mention "Which plan names containing 'Unlimited'".

We included "Unlimited" from "Global Unlimited 5 Days" etc. But we didn't refer by name exactly. But it is okay. We could mention "Global Unlimited 5 Days". But we only mention "Unlimited". It's fine.

Now ensure we didn't mention "E" but not necessary.

Now produce final answer.

Potential risk: The phrase "Tetheringも可能" might not be considered as "tethering allowed". The guidelines mention "Tethering allowed". It's okay. Japanese translation "Tetheringも可能" may be okay. But to be safe, we might use "テーピング (テラス) も可能" maybe no. We'll keep "テレワーク" maybe not. But we can keep "Tetheringも可能".

Now final answer. నేను.

Proceed with the final output.<|end|><|start|>assistant<|channel|>final<|message|>Giga.Telのマダガスカル向けeSIMで “Unlimited” と名付けられたプランは、実際には1 GB/日で上限が設定されており、その上限を超えると速度が512 kbpsに制限されます。連続的に高速でデータ通信を行いたい場合は、本質的に無制限データとは言えません。

代わりに、より大容量が必要なユーザーには20 GBのプランが用意されています。例えば、Global Special 20 GBは1年（365日）有効で70.49 USD、また20 GB／30日有効のGlobal 20 GBは143.99 USDです。両プランとも4 Gネットワークで提供され、速度制限なし、Tetheringも可能で、通常の利用ではコストパフォーマンスが高い選択肢となります。

Giga.Telはマダガスカル向けに電話番号付きやSMS対応のeSIMプランを提供していません。データ通信専用のeSIMプランのみが用意されているため、電話番号やSMS機能はありません。電話番号やSMSがなくても、LINEやFacebook Messenger、iMessageなどのVoIPアプリはデータ通信で動作しますので、通話やメッセージの送受信は可能です。

Giga.Telはマダガスカル向けに国別プランを提供していませんが、マダガスカルを含む複数国プランとして38件を提供しています。これらはうち8件が日額データ上限付き（日額上限付きプラン）です。また30件が定量データ上限付き（定量データプラン）です。価格は$6.99から$195.99の範囲で、データ容量は1GBから20GBまで設定され、有効期間は1日から365日までさまざまです。