Provide a natural sentence that states the provider count and prepaid data plan count, using rounded numbers that are "キリの良い数字 (Datasetとして提供されているもの)" - meaning we should produce rounded numbers from dataset to be "nice" numbers.

They say: "まずはじめに、バルト三国で利用可能なプロバイダーの数とプリペイドデータプランの数について、四捨五入した後のキリの良い数字（Datasetとして提供されているもの）を使って、自然な一文で伝えてください。"

So we need to round the dataset values: provider count over 90 -> maybe 90 or 100? But it's "over 90" meaning at least 90. Rounding to "nice" number: 90 or 100. "over 90" suggests 90+; but we want rounding maybe 90 (since over 90). Prepaid data plan over 4100 -> maybe 4100? Or 4100, the dataset says over 4100, so maybe 4100. But rounding might be 4100? That's not a nice rounding per se. Could round to 4100 or 4000 or 4200? They say "キリの良い数字". 90 is a nice round. 4100 is a bit large but still round (anything that ends in 00). So 4100 is fine. We can do 90 providers, 4100 plans.

We need to check requirements: "キリの良い数字（Datasetとして提供されているもの）" So we should use rounded numbers that are still consistent with dataset. The dataset says "over 90" and "over 4100". We'll round down to 90 for provider count, and 4100 for plan count. Or maybe 100? But 100 is not "over 90" exactly; but it's more than 90, so it's okay: "over 90" could be 100; but they'd want a round number that matches "over 90" approximate. But 100 might overshoot more. But instruction: "四捨五入した後のキリの良い数字（Datasetとして提供されているもの）". The dataset says "over 90" not a specific number; we can't round an unknown. The dataset value is "over 90". We could round to nearest ten maybe 90 (since it's the base). "over 90" maybe 90 +? But using 90 might be less than actual numbers. The phrase "over 90" implies at least 90. It's fine to say 90. I'd say 90. But we can say "90+" but they want a "nice number". We'll state "90" but with a note that it's over 90; but we can't mention "over" again? The instruction: "四捨五入した後のキリの良い数字（Datasetとして提供されているもの）" Means we should round after rounding (maybe round to nearest tens/hundreds). So 90 is fine. For 4100 is 4100, also rounding. That seems okay.

Now we need to produce a natural sentence that states this. Eg: "バルト三国で利用可能な旅行eSIMのプロバイダーは約90社、プリペイドデータプランは約4100種類あります。"

We need to use "over" or not? They said use rounded numbers (Dataset). Possibly use "約" or "around". But we should not mention the dataset values "over" maybe. We'll phrase politely: "約90社、約4100種類" etc. They said "四捨五入した後のキリの良い数字（Datasetとして提供されているもの）". So we should produce "90" and "4100". We'll use "約" maybe accepted but may not be exactly correct. The instructions didn't forbid using "約". But clarifying "around" might not be necessary. We'll just say "90", "4100". But we might say "90カ国" no. Wait.

Better to say "90社、4100種類". But we also need to articulate about 200 threshold: "データプラン数が200以上の場合、選択肢が豊富にあることに触れ、旅行者が自分に合ったeSIMを見つけやすいことを伝えてください。".

We have 4100 > 200, so we need to mention selection abundance, traveler's ability to pick suitable eSIM.

We must use the "国別プラン", "複数国プラン", "定量データプラン" keywords accordingly. We'll incorporate them.

But the dataset itself doesn't specify numbers for those labels. We just need to incorporate them. But the instructions say:

特定の一カ国のみで利用できるプランは「国別プラン」, 2カ国以上で利用できるプランは「複数国プラン」, 一定のデータ容量上限が設定されたプランは「定量データプラン」.

so we can mention that many providers offer these types of plans. It's a good addition.

Let's craft answer:

"バルト三国で利用可能な旅行eSIMのプロバイダーは90社、プリペイドのデータプランは4100種類あります。"

Then mention that >200 gives plenty of options to find the right plan.

Then mention the types of plans such as国別プラン, 複数国プラン, 定量データプラン.

We need to mention that some providers offer国別プラン, others複数国プラン, and定量データプランis common. That satisfies the requirement to use those words.

We need to maintain clarity, no dash. So we avoid dashed connectors. We'll use punctuation, comma. and parentheses.

We can produce something like:

"バルト三国で利用可能な旅行eSIMのプロバイダーは90社、プリペイドデータプランは4100種類です。選択肢が豊富で、旅行者は自分の通話やデータ使用量に合わせて最適なプランを見つけやすいです。多くのプロバイダーが、単一国でのみ利用できる国別プラン、複数国で利用できる複数国プラン、そして一定容量までに限定された定量データプランを提供しています。"

That seems to satisfy.

But check: We need "一文" start with provider count and plan count. They ask: "まずはじめに、バルト三国で利用可能なプロバイダーの数とプリペイドデータプラン数について、四捨五入した後のキリの良い数字（Datasetとして提供されているもの）を使って、自然な一文で伝えてください。"

So the first sentence: "バルト三国で利用可能な旅行eSIMのプロバイダーは90社、プリペイドデータプランは4100種類あります。"

That lumps both counts.

Then next sentences: mention selection, use key terms. Also we shouldn't mention the threshold 200.

We should be careful: "200以上" threshold is in instructions to not mention threshold 200 explicitly. They say "If data plan count >200: mention it's plentiful." So we should mention that there are many options. We should not mention "200". So we can simply say "選択肢が豊富で、旅行者は自分のニーズに合ったeSIMを見つけやすい" etc.

Now about "国別プラン" etc. The phrasing: "単一国でのみ利用できる国別プラン、2国以上で利用できる複数国プラン、定量データプラン".

But the dataset might not specify counts for each type. We can just mention that many providers offer those types.

We should also ensure we use English provider names: "Travelers may find providers such as Truphone, Airalo, GigSky, etc." But we need to keep them in English. We can list examples. However, might be optional.

But maybe listing will be helpful for FAQ: Provide some examples for the best known ones. But my answer must not mention lack of other providers. But we can mention that a variety of providers exist. But we might use some names: "Airalo", "GigSky", "Truphone", "Nomad" etc. All in English.

But it's better to keep it short: "多数のプロバイダーが国別プラン、複数国プラン、定量データプランを提供しています。".

We must avoid using dash. But "Truphone" is a word, dash not needed.

Now check rule: "回答の本文には質問内容を確認したりリピートするような表現は含めないでください" We are basically not repeating question. Our answer does not mention "Question" or such.

Also no titles.

Also "回答では「—」(ダッシュ)を使用せず"

We should avoid en-dash or em-dash. Use comma. The sentence we wrote does not contain dashes.

Now about the mention of "キリの良い数字". The dataset value for provider is "over 90". Rounding "over 90" to 90? Might be okay. For plan: "over 4100", 4100 maybe. But we need to round to integer that is nice. 4100 is nice.

Now ensure "四捨五入" important: Over 90 could be 90 or 100? If we want to round to 90. After rounding maybe 90. For 4100 maybe 4100. Good.

Maybe we should use "約" to convey approximate. But the instruction didn't forbid it. But we used "～" as rounding. We wrote "プロバイダーは90社…4100種類あります。" That is straightforward.

Now we need to mention "選択肢が豊富". Good.

Now let's produce final answer with proper punctuation.

Check for dash: no dashes. We used "国別プラン", "複数国プラン", "定量データプラン". We're good.

We used no hyphens.

Now the answer:

"バルト三国で利用可能な旅行eSIMのプロバイダーは90社、プリペイドデータプランは4100種類あります。選択肢が豊富で、旅行者は自分のニーズに合ったeSIMを見つけやすいです。多くのプロバイダーが、単一国でのみ利用できる国別プラン、複数国で利用できる複数国プラン、そして一定容量までに限定された定量データプランを提供しています。"

This should align.

We should double-check the instructions: They said to use parentheses for some words maybe? But they don't require parentheses. We'll keep it as above.

Let's check for rule about "回答では「—」(ダッシュ)を使用せず" So no dash. We are good.

We used no dash.

Let's check about "回答にタイトルは付けず" We didn't attach any title.

Now see if we mention "国別プラン", "複数国プラン", "定量データプラン". Yes.

Let's ensure we didn't mention "over" or "over 90" or "over 4100". We used "90" and "4100". No "over".

But the instruction: "Dataset: "| プロバイダー数 | over 90 | ...".

In answer we use "90" but it's approximate. Acceptable.

Now produce final answer.

We also might mention "Airalo", "GigSky" to provide examples, but not required. But we might add some names for quality. But it might lengthen answer. But fine.

But it's not prohibited; we can provide examples to help. But careful: using provider names in English okay. But must not produce misinformation. But we just mention generic.

Better to keep concise.

Now let's re-evaluate: Many providers like "Airalo", "Truphone", "GigSky" etc. But also "Nomad" not a provider? "Nomad" is more like a service bridging. But it's okay.

But we don't need examples. The question asked: "バルト三国で利用できる旅行eSIMブランド（プロバイダー）はどれくらいありますか？また、プリペイドのデータプランはいくつありますか？"

So answer focusing on numbers plus details. Good.

Now produce final answer accordingly. Let's revise final answer to maybe mention examples optionally.

Option 1 (the simplest). Provide numbers, mention abundance.

Option 2: Add provider names.

Given we should not mention "over 90" in answer, but maybe we should mention "90カ国"? no, that is wrong.

We'll keep it as above.

But I'm thinking: The instruction says "四捨五入した後のキリの良い数字（Datasetとして提供されているもの）" "グッド" means we should round the dataset numbers. The dataset had "over 90" and "over 4100". We need to round to a nice number, but "over" suggests a range. So maybe we should round 90 upwards to 95? But 90 is fine. 4100 is fine. Good.

But we might do "約90社、約4100種". The "約" doesn't change the number, but indicates approximate. This implies rounding although we used numbers. That might be better. But instruction says: "四捨五入した後のキリの良い数字" So we could say "90社、4100種類" or "約90社、約4100種類". The dataset had "over". So "約" can signify approximate. I'd use "約90社". That might be safest.

Let's restructure:

"バルト三国で利用可能な旅行eSIMのプロバイダーは約90社、プリペイドデータプランは約4100種類あります。"

Thus we keep approximate.

Now incorporate next sentences.

We must not mention dash. So perhaps no dash after "約".

We're good.

Also mention "国別プラン", "複数国プラン", "定量データプラン".

Let's produce final answer accordingly.

Check lengths: short ~3-4 sentences.

We should also ensure not to mention the 200 threshold.

We must not use dashes like "90社-". That is fine.

Time to produce final answer.

バルト三国で利用できる旅行eSIMの中で、無制限データプランはありますか？

<|channel|>analysis<|message|>We need to answer a specific question: "バルト三国で利用できる旅行eSIMの中で、無制限データプランはありますか？"

The instructions: Provide answer for FAQ section of eSIMDB. The answer should be clear, helpful. Provide info about whether unlimited data plans exist among eSIMs available for Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania presumably). Use the dataset to see if there are unlimited plans that cover those countries. But dataset shows providers with unlimited plans. They didn't specify regional coverage per plan. We need to interpret: dataset says "Plans by Provider" with unlimited data but no mention of countries. The answer should consider if unlimited data plans exist in Baltic countries. We need to check dataset: does any provider have unlimited data in those countries? The dataset doesn't specify coverage. We must rely on dataset: For providers with unlimited data (first list). But we need to know if any have coverage in Baltic countries. The dataset may not mention coverage, but maybe it's implicitly covering all worldwide? We can't assume that; but we might need to answer based on dataset: It lists unlimited plans, but we may need to specify that such plans exist. But we might say that there are unlimited data plans from various providers that can be used in Baltic countries, but some may have throttling. We also need price range. According to instructions: IF unlim data plan exists > 0, list all providers. Also mention speed limit/throttling if applicable. Also summarize overall price range.

Let's parse dataset: Providers that have unlimited plans: Firsty, Airhub, Roamify, MicroEsim, Billion Connect, Yoho Mobile, abesteSIM, Truely, Yesim, esimzon.

Also check for other parameters: All have speed throttling or speed limit. We should mention limits for any provider with 'Speed limit: ...' or 'Speed may be throttled'.

Specifically:

Firsty: Speed may be throttled, Speed limit: 256kbps.
Airhub: Speed may be throttled.
Roamify: Speed may be throttled.
MicroEsim: Speed may be throttled.
Billion Connect: Speed may be throttled.
Yoho Mobile: Speed may be throttled, Speed limit 5Mbps.
abesteSIM: Speed may be throttled, Speed limit 5Mbps.
Truely: Speed may be throttled.
Yesim: Speed may be throttled.
esimzon: Speed may be throttled.

Thus all unlimited plans mention 'Speed may be throttled' and for some have explicit speed limit. Provide speed limit details.

Price ranges: For unlimited plans, the dataset indicates price ranges all around $0.00 to $40.85 range (#). But we need the overall price range for the offered unlimited data plans. Should we compute min and max across all? The instruction: "提供されている無制限データプランの全体としての価格帯をまとめ、回答に含めてください。プロバイダーごとの詳細な価格説明は不要です。" So we summarize the overall price range across all unlimited data plans. That would be the minimum price among unlimited plans (Minimum $0.00? Firsty is $0.00 for 1-day unlimited?). Max price around $41.35? Let's verify: The dataset shows price ranges for each provider unlimited: For Firsty $0.00 one-day plan. Airhub $2.00 - $24.50 for 1-15 days. Roamify $2.50 - $40.00 for 1-20 days. MicroEsim $2.92 - $38.27 for 1-10 days. Billion Connect $2.99 - $33.74 for 1-15 days. Yoho Mobile $2.99 - $40.85 for 1-15 days. abesteSIM $3.77 - $36.75 for 1-10 days. Truely $5.52 - $36.92 for 1-10 days. Yesim $8.27 - $41.35 for 1-15 days. esimzon $40.00 for 15 days. So overall price range min $0.00 (Firsty 1-day) to max $41.35 (Yesim 15 days). The price range across all unlimited plans could be written "〜$0.00〜$41.35" or "約$0〜$41.35". However we should provide the overall price range for unlimited data plans.

But we also need to check if any of these providers specifically cover Baltic countries. The dataset does not specify coverage. But we can infer that the dataset is eSIM plans generally; perhaps they cover many countries globally including Baltic. In FAQs, we might say: There are unlimited data plans available from various providers; these plans can be used in Baltic countries, though coverage varies by provider. But we need to be cautious: Provide a general answer, not overspecify.

Also we need to ensure the answer is natural for a FAQ. Use Japanese correct grammar. The answer must not include "—" (dash). Use Japanese punctuation but not dash. No bullet lists. So we must express all information in paragraph form. We should mention each provider's unlimited plan, mention any speed limit or throttling. Then summarise price range. Avoid bullet points.

We also must not refer to "dataset" or "provided information". So just write like "無料" or "0.00 USD" etc. We will speak from perspective of eSIMDB: It's a comparison site, so we can say "eSIMDBが確認した限り" but must not mention dataset. But we can say "以下のプロバイダー". That is fine.

We also must not use dash. Use commas and parentheses. We can use parentheses for details. Avoid hyphen.

Do not output a title. Just the answer.

Let's craft a paragraph:

"For the Baltic states, there are several eSIM providers that offer unlimited data plans. Firsty provides a 1‑day unlimited plan with a modest speed limit of 256kbps and the plan may be throttled; Airhub offers unlimited plans for 1‑15 days with possible throttling; Roamify gives unlimited data from 1‑20 days, also subject to throttling; MicroEsim and Billion Connect similarly provide unlimited options for 1‑10 or 1‑15 days respectively with throttling; Yoho Mobile offers 1‑15 day unlimited plans with a speed cap of 5Mbps and possible throttling; abesteSIM gives 1‑10 day unlimited plans with a 5Mbps cap and throttling; Truely, Yesim, and esimzon all provide indefinite data plans, each potentially throttled. The overall price range for these unlimited plans spans from as low as $0.00 for Firsty’s one‑day offer up to around $41.35 for Yesim’s 15‑day plan, giving travelers a broad spectrum of price options."

But need to keep no bullet points. The above uses semicolons and commas. That's fine. No dash. Use parentheses for speed details. Avoid hyphen.

We need to check that we didn't inadvertently use dash. We used en dashes? There's hyphen in "1-15 days" using dash, but the instruction says "—" (dash) usage. They said: "回答では「—」（ダッシュ）を使用せず、読点（、）や括弧（）などを使用してください。" So we should not use "—". But a hyphen '-' is also basically a dash? The instruction only references the "—" char, which is an em dash? They want no dash: "—" (dash). But hyphen maybe also considered dash. But they haven't limited hyphen. They wrote "—" which is an em dash? Actually "—" might be an em dash or dash. To be safe maybe avoid hyphens in date ranges "1-15 days" and use "1〜15日" or "1〜15日間" plus "〜" it's a tilda or dash? The tilda symbol is also a dash? It's a wave dash. The instruction likely wants no hyphen/dash. So we should avoid any hyphens/dashes. Use a Japanese range notation "1〜15日". Use "〜" but that might also count as dash? It's a "wave dash" not exactly hyphen. But to be safe, we can phrase ranges in words: "1〜15日間" uses "" but it's stylized. We may use "1〜15日" but that's still a dash-like. Maybe better to phrase "1〜15日間" which uses the wave, but we need something else. We could say "1日から15日間" to avoid hyphen/dash. For simplicity, we can say "1日〜15日" but that still includes "". The "" might be considered a dash. The instruction: "回答では「—」（ダッシュ）を使用せず、読点（、）や括弧（）などを使用してください。" It's ambiguous if they disallow any dash-like, but likely they just mean no hyphen/dash char. The hyphen may be considered a dash? Let's re-read: They say "—（ダッシュ）" which is an em dash. That is a specific dash. They say avoid that. So a hyphen might be okay. But to be safe, no em dash or en dash. So use hyphen only? We'll avoid all hyphens or dash characters? I'd replace "1-15 days" with "1日〜15日間" where "" is a tilde. That might be okay. Use no hyphen.

Also avoid colon? Because colon is fine. We don't worry.

Instead of "Firsty provides a 1-day unlimited plan" we can say "Firstyは1日限定の無制限データプランを提供しており、速度は256kbpsに制限される可能性があるため、速度抑制が行われる場合があります." That uses Japanese. But we want to keep content concise. We can express in Japanese properly. But the instruction: "eSIMプロバイダー名は日本語にはせず、英語のままにしてください。" So we keep provider names in English.

We need to keep answer in Japanese only. So we will phrase each provider in Japanese but names in English. Use Japanese syntax.

We must mention price range in USD. Use "$0.00〜$41.35" but that uses "〜" which is a dash like? The "〜" is a wave dash. But maybe it's okay. But we can say "0.00米ドル〜41.35米ドル". That uses "〜". Could be okay.

We avoid "—".

Now also the instruction about "IF無制限データプランが1つ以上存在する場合" means there are unlimited data plans. Yes there are. So we need to list all providers and mention speed limits or throttling. And provide overall price range.

We should not use bullet lists. So must embed all in a paragraph. That's fine.

We also must not mention "第一に" or "最初に"? It's okay.

We have to not refer to dataset. Avoid that. We need to read: "回答では質問内容を確認したりリピートするような表現は含めないでください". So no "question" references. We need direct answer.

Be careful: Did they want speed limit mention? "If there are speed limit (maxSpeed) or speed throttling (Possible throttling) etc." All unlimited plans have speed throttling or limit. We note each. But there are many. We can summarize: "Firstyは速度上限256kbpsを持ち、他のプロバイダーは速度が制限されることがあります。Yoho MobileとabesteSIMでは速度上限5Mbpsが設定されています。" Might be enough.

But we must mention all. They want "unlimited data plans" and "if there are speed limit or throttling, mention briefly". So we must mention all providers, but we can't bullet list; we need to incorporate all into continuous text. That might be messy but doable.

Let's list each provider maybe separated by commas: "Firsty、Airhub、Roamify、MicroEsim、Billion Connect、Yoho Mobile、abesteSIM、Truely、Yesim、esimzon". That's all.

We must mention each's speed limit & throttling. For each provider: "Firstyは速度が256kbpsに制限されるが速度制限の可能性がある、Airhubは速度が制限される可能性がある、Roamifyは速度が制限される可能性がある、MicroEsimは速度が制限される可能性がある、Billion Connectは速度が制限される可能性がある、Yoho Mobileは速度が5Mbpsに制限される可能性がある、abesteSIMは速度が5Mbpsに制限される可能性がある、Truelyは速度が制限される可能性がある、Yesimは速度が制限される可能性がある、esimzonは速度が制限される可能性がある". But it reads long. We might condense: "first and many others may have speed restrictions or throttling; Yoho Mobile and abesteSIM have a 5Mbps cap; Firsty has a 256kbps cap".

Also mention "All unlimited plans may have throttling". That covers all. Yes.

Then overall price range. So final answer should be clear: There are unlimited plans. Provide list of providers and speed restrictions, summarise price range. No bullet points. Avoid dash.

Let's write:

"バルト三国で利用できる旅行eSIMの無制限データプランは複数存在し、Firsty、Airhub、Roamify、MicroEsim、Billion Connect、Yoho Mobile、abesteSIM、Truely、Yesim、esimzonの各プロバイダーが提供しています。すべての無制限プランは速度制限或いは速度抑制の可能性があり、Firstyでは最大速度256kbpsに制限されるほか、Yoho MobileとabesteSIMでは5Mbpsに制限されるケースがあります。価格面では、最安値はFirstyの1日プランで0.00米ドル、最上限はYesimの15日プランで約41.35米ドルと、幅広い選択肢が用意されています。"

Check all conditions: no dash char "—". We used "〜"? We used "〜" as in "15日プランで約41.35米ドル". The "〜" used? Between 0.00 and 41.35 we didn't use "~". We used "〜" only if we wrote "0.00〜41.35". But we wrote "0.00米ドル、最上限はYesimの15日プランで約41.35米ドル". That is fine. We used no dash. We used parentheses for speed limit. Actually we used parentheses? We wrote "最大速度256kbps". Not parentheses. That is okay. We used commas. No dashes. No bullet list. We used all provider names. We mention speed restrictions. Summarized price range.

But instructions: "speed limit (maxSpeed) や速度制限や帯域制限 (Possible throttling) などの制約がある場合は、それについても簡潔に触れてください". We mention which have speed limit. We also mention the general throttling possibility "速度制限或いは速度抑制の可能性があり". That covers it. Good.

But we didn't mention provider names in parentheses? The instruction says no dash. parentheses used for speed details alternative. We didn't use parentheses but that's okay. "maximum speed 256kbps" not in parentheses. But the instruction didn't require parentheses. It's optional.

Also need to mention US $ sign? We used "米ドル" succinctly. It's fine.

We need to ensure no dash or hyphen. Did we use hyphen anywhere? Let's check the text.

"Firsty、Airhub、Roamify、MicroEsim、Billion Connect、Yoho Mobile、abesteSIM、Truely、Yesim、esimzonの各プロバイダーが提供しています。すべての無制限プランは速度制限或いは速度抑制の可能性があり、Firstyでは最大速度256kbpsに制限されるほか、Yoho MobileとabesteSIMでは5Mbpsに制限されるケースがあります。価格面では、最安値はFirstyの1日プランで0.00米ドル、最上限はYesimの15日プランで約41.35米ドルと、幅広い選択肢が用意されています。"

No hyphen. No dash. Good.

But the "15日プラン" uses space between 15 and日. That's fine.

We used "k" etc. No dash.

We must also check for any incomplete statements.

Could we make answer a bit more thorough? They ask: "バルト三国で利用できる旅行eSIMの中で、無制限データプランはありますか？" So answer says yes, there are unlimited plans. Provide list. Provide speed limit. Provide price range. Good.

But wait: The instructions: "必ず日本語の文章を出力してください。" We did that.

"回答では「—」(ダッシュ)を使用せず、読点（、）や括弧（）などを使用してください。" We didn't use dash. We used punctuation. We didn't use parentheses. We could add parentheses for speed details: "最大速度 (256kbps)". That might be better. They said "括弧()" to use. It's optional but we can include. Let's add parentheses around speed limit values to follow "使ってください" clause. We'll add parentheses. Like "最大速度(256kbps)" and "5Mbpsに制限". Let's modify.

Also maybe mention the speed limit for those two explicit. Use parentheses.

So update text accordingly:

"Firstyでは最大速度(256kbps)に制限されるほか、Yoho MobileとabesteSIMでは最大速度(5Mbps)に制限されるケースがあります。"

Now confirm we maintain no en-dash or hyphen. We used the full-width parentheses "（）"? They want "(" and ")" but Japanese standard uses full-width "（）". But they said "括弧（）". We can use full-width parentheses to meet rule. So we write: "最大速度（256kbps）". That uses Japanese parentheses. That is fine.

Also in earlier text "Speed may be throttled" we replaced with "速度抑制の可能性". That's okay.

Now we must check for any dash characters: "～" perhaps? The "～" is a long dash. They said "—" not "〜". The Ō-length dash is fullwidth tilde, might be okay. We can avoid it. We used none. Good.

Now check sentence structure; no bullet.

The answer is fine.

But instructions: "回答では質問内容を確認したりリピートするような表現は含めないでください". Does this sentence contain repeated question? It's fine.

"必ず日本語の文章を出力してください" we wrote Japanese.

Now check: "eSIMプロバイダー名は日本語にはせず、英語のままにしてください." We used provider names in English (Firsty, Airhub, etc.). Good.

We refer to "米ドル" in Japanese but currency symbol "米ドル" is okay. Possibly we can use "$" symbol. They didn't forbid. But we could represent as "$". "Firstyの1日プランで0.00米ドル" is okay. But maybe they wanted USD symbol. The dataset had $ symbol. Let's keep "$". We can use "$0.00" but that might look like currency sign preceded by a dollar. We wrote "0.00米ドル". That may be okay.

But we can incorporate $ sign inside parentheses. For price range we can say "最安値はFirstyの1日プランで $0.00、最上限はYesimの15日プランで $41.35". That uses $ sign. That's fine. Let's use that.

Rewrite price part: "最安値はFirstyの1日プランで $0.00、最上限はYesimの15日プランで $41.35と、幅広い選択肢が用意されています。"

Now check no dash. "15日プラン" no dash. The "$" sign is fine. There's no dash.

Now overall answer:

"バルト三国で利用できる旅行eSIMの無制限データプランは複数存在し、Firsty、Airhub、Roamify、MicroEsim、Billion Connect、Yoho Mobile、abesteSIM、Truely、Yesim、esimzonの各プロバイダーが提供しています。すべての無制限プランは速度抑制の可能性があり、Firstyでは最大速度（256kbps）に制限されるほか、Yoho MobileとabesteSIMでは最大速度（5Mbps）に制限されるケースがあります。価格面では、最安値はFirstyの1日プランで $0.00、最上限はYesimの15日プランで $41.35と、幅広い選択肢が用意されています。"

We need to ensure there is no dash/hyphen. We have "1日プラン" but no hyphen. "0.00" no dash. Good.

Need to check for any "1-15 days" phrase? We replaced with "1〜15日間"? We didn't mention. No dash/hyphen. Good.

Thus answer seems okay.

However we used "Max speed (256kbps)" with parentheses. We used "最大速度（256kbps）". But we used full-width parentheses earlier? We wrote "最大速度（256kbps）". It's full-width Chinese characters? Actually Japanese parentheses uses full-width "（）". We wrote "最大速度（256kbps）". Good.

Wait we wrote "最大速度（256kbps）" in earlier version but now we wrote "最大速度（256kbps）" again. Good.

Also "最大速度（5Mbps）". Good.

Now check for any dashes: The hyphen "Firsty's 1日プラン" no hyphen. "Firstyの1日プランで $0.00" no hyphen. "1日" correct.

Thus final answer meets rules.

But we didn't mention "無制限データプランが1つ以上存在する場合" instructions: They said to "IF無制限データプランが1つ以上存在する場合 - 無制限データプランを提供しているeSIMプロバイダーをすべて挙げてください" So we have done that. "If there are speed limits, mention them." We did. "Provide overall price range". We have "最安値" and "最上限".

But we need to mention "overall price range" as "最安値 ...、最上限 ...". That's our range.

We might also provide the numerical range: "$0.00 - $41.35". Alternatively we might phrase "価格は $0.00〜$41.35です". That uses a tilde. But that uses "〜" about a dash. However they didn't forbid tilde. It may be considered dash? In the instruction, they only mention "—" dash. The tilde is different. But "〜" maybe take as "dash"? I'm not sure. But to be safe, avoid using "〜". We used hyphens? We used "0.00" and "41.35" separate.

We wrote "最安値 ... $0.00、最上限 ... $41.35". Good.

Thus final answer likely fine.

Double-check for any dash: There's "Firstyの1日プランで $0.00" no dash. Good.

Any missing details? Should mention that all these unlimited plans are available for use in Baltic countries? The answer states "バルト三国で利用できる旅行eSIMの無制限データプランは複数存在". That might refer that these plans are available for use there. That is acceptable. The question: "バルト三国で利用できる旅行eSIMの中で、無制限データプランはありますか？" So we answered that yes, there are unlimited data plans. And we listed them.

But perhaps we need to specify that coverage includes those countries. But the dataset didn't specify coverage. It's safe to say "バルト三国で利用できる旅行eSIMの無制限データプランは複数存在". That implies they are available. We can further mention that the coverage may vary by provider and users should check network availability for each country. But maybe we can include: "各プロバイダーの対応国は異なりますので、利用予定の国でネットワークが使用できるか事前に確認してください". We need to mention this advice. But the instruction doesn't forbid that. We just need to give info that proves that there are unlimited plans. Also we need to mention price range.

We can add a short sentence: "ただし、各プロバイダーのカバレッジは異なるため、利用予定の国で適用可能かどうかは事前に確認してください". This is okay, no dash.

Add that. But then we might break instruction "別の文脈で余計な情報"? But it's natural. The question didn't ask about coverage differences but it's helpful.

The instructions: "不要" but maybe it's okay.

Make the full answer:

"バルト三国で利用できる旅行eSIMの無制限データプランは複数存在し、Firsty、Airhub、Roamify、MicroEsim、Billion Connect、Yoho Mobile、abesteSIM、Truely、Yesim、esimzonの各プロバイダーが提供しています。すべての無制限プランは速度抑制の可能性があり、Firstyでは最大速度（256kbps）に制限されるほか、Yoho MobileとabesteSIMでは最大速度（5Mbps）に制限されるケースがあります。価格面では、最安値はFirstyの1日プランで $0.00、最上限はYesimの15日プランで $41.35と、幅広い選択肢が用意されています。ただし、各プロバイダーのカバレッジは異なるため、利用予定の国で適用可能かどうかは事前に確認してください。"

We added mention of checking coverage. That is okay.

Everything else fine.

Double-check no dash or hyphen: We used "5Mbps" no hyphen. Ok.

Check for no "—": no.

Check for any unspecified exclamation or repetition: Not repeated.

Make sure no "Question" mention. None.

Now confirm no bullet list: It's single paragraph. Uses commas. Ok.

Now deliver answer.<|end|><|start|>assistant<|channel|>final<|message|>バルト三国で利用できる旅行eSIMの無制限データプランは複数存在し、Firsty、Airhub、Roamify、MicroEsim、Billion Connect、Yoho Mobile、abesteSIM、Truely、Yesim、esimzonの各プロバイダーが提供しています。すべての無制限プランは速度抑制の可能性があり、Firstyでは最大速度（256kbps）に制限されるほか、Yoho MobileとabesteSIMでは最大速度（5Mbps）に制限されるケースがあります。価格面では、最安値はFirstyの1日プランで $0.00、最上限はYesimの15日プランで $41.35と、幅広い選択肢が用意されています。ただし、各プロバイダーのカバレッジは異なるため、利用予定の国で適用可能かどうかは事前に確認してください。

Summarized by Gen AI. Last updated: September 29, 2025